The Kilted Writer

I've been active on a number of forums for writers lately. Inevitably, the extremely divisive topic of editing comes up. You have the one side that says, "I don't need an editor, I can edit my own work." On the other hand, you have those who point out that one of the biggest problems in indie publishing is the (not necessarily unfounded) reputation it has for poor quality. Part of the problem in the discussion comes down to definitions. Here's what I mean: Author : I don't need an editor. I have five degrees related to English grammar. I have absolutely zero errors in my manuscript. I can edit my own work. Reader : You're right. I didn't find any errors in grammar or usage, but your character arc is very weak and you have a few plot holes. You still need an editor. Author : But you said my manuscript was perfect! Besides, what's a "character ark?" You see, there are at least four different kinds of editing. Many writers I've e

I have been following several discussions on LinkedIn about the market for short-form fiction for a couple of weeks. It is amazing to me how short-sighted and ignorant of history some people are. Several people seemed to believe that short stories have never been a viable outlet for writers or that writers who are "serious" about their craft would never debase themselves so much by writing short fiction. (I've paraphrased and may have added some embellishment). One commenter in a discussion went so far as to say you could not be a good short story writer if you wrote long-form and that short story writers could never write a decent novel. (Um, ever hear of Stephen King, John Updike, F. Scott Fitzgerald, John Steinbeck, Isaac Asimov, William Faulkner, etc...) As a result of all this conversation, I decided to give you my take on what's happening in the short story market and why. I'm no business insider, but I believe a little history goes a long way to understan